Wilcher v. State
44 S.E. 995, 118 Ga. 196, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 494
Opinion
1. It is not necessary that an indictment based upon the Penal' Code, § 219, par. 3, should allege that the act of trespass therein mentioned, was “wilfully” committed.
2. The evidence introduced on the trial of the present case fully warranted the' finding of the jury that the accused was guilty of the offense with which he stood charged ; and, in view of the showing made by the State in resistance-to his effort to secure a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, his conviction should be allowed to stand.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilcher v. State, 44 S.E. 995, 118 Ga. 196, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 494 (Ga. 1903).
44 S.E. 995 (Wilcher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caswell v. State
120 S.E. 21 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Brantley v. State
84 S.E. 131 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Wilson v. State
84 S.E. 81 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Shrouder v. State
49 S.E. 702 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)