Wilburn v. State

174 So. 3d 469, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11968
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 12, 2015
DocketNos. 4D13-4224, 4D13-4225, 4D13-4226
StatusPublished

This text of 174 So. 3d 469 (Wilburn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilburn v. State, 174 So. 3d 469, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11968 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in this consolidated appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 [470]*470(1967), but remand for the trial court to enter a written order revoking probation in the underlying cases. The order must specify which conditions the trial court found to have been violated. Ruiz v. State, 78 So.3d 57, 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (citing Mills v. State, 948 So.2d 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)).

Affirmed, but remanded.

GROSS, GERBER and FORST, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Mills v. State
948 So. 2d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Ruiz v. State
78 So. 3d 57 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 So. 3d 469, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilburn-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.