Wilburn v. State
This text of 696 So. 2d 496 (Wilburn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the State properly concedes, the trial court erred by imposing an upward departure sentence without giving written reasons for the departure. However, a review of the record reveals that the trial court was un[497]*497aware that it was imposing a departure sentence. Therefore, on remand, the trial court is permitted to reconsider whether a departure from the sentencing guidelines is appropriate and if so, to set forth valid reasons for the departure. State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107, 1108 (Fla.1989).
The defendant’s remaining point lacks merit.
Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
696 So. 2d 496, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7588, 1997 WL 363007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilburn-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.