Wilburn H. Henderson v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction

Eighth Circuit

Wilburn H. Henderson v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction

939 F.2d 586

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedAugust 23, 1991

Docket90-1550

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 939 F.2d 586 (Wilburn H. Henderson v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilburn H. Henderson v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction, 939 F.2d 586 (8th Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER GRANTING REHEARING IN PART.

The court grants in part the petition for rehearing. The court amends its earlier opinion filed February 19, 1991, 926 F.2d 706 (8th Cir.) as follows: The discussion within Part A of the opinion previously filed which holds Rule 37 counsel ineffective under the standards set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), and finds cause to lift the procedural bar is hereby vacated. See Coleman v. Thompson, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2546, 115 L.Ed.2d 640 (1991).

All other discussions within Part A and the court’s holding that the constitutional violation based on trial counsel’s ineffectiveness “probably resulted in the conviction of one who is actually innocent” is reaffirmed. Accordingly the district court’s grant of the writ of habeas corpus vacating Henderson’s conviction is reaffirmed.

The suggestion for rehearing en banc as to the alternative holding by the panel is now hereby referred to the full court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER GRANTING REHEARING IN PART.

The court grants in part the petition for rehearing. The court amends its earlier opinion filed February 19, 1991, 926 F.2d 706 (8th Cir.) as follows: The discussion within Part A of the opinion previously filed which holds Rule 37 counsel ineffective under the standards set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), and finds cause to lift the procedural bar is hereby vacated. See Coleman v. Thompson, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2546, 115 L.Ed.2d 640 (1991).

All other discussions within Part A and the court’s holding that the constitutional violation based on trial counsel’s ineffectiveness “probably resulted in the conviction of one who is actually innocent” is reaffirmed. Accordingly the district court’s grant of the writ of habeas corpus vacating Henderson’s conviction is reaffirmed.

The suggestion for rehearing en banc as to the alternative holding by the panel is now hereby referred to the full court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

939 F.2d 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilburn-h-henderson-v-willis-sargent-warden-arkansas-department-of-ca8-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack