Wilburn C. Ervin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Sixth Circuit

Wilburn C. Ervin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

966 F.2d 1452, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22615, 1992 WL 133027

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 12, 1992

Docket91-6217

StatusUnpublished

This text of 966 F.2d 1452 (Wilburn C. Ervin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilburn C. Ervin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 966 F.2d 1452, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22615, 1992 WL 133027 (6th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

966 F.2d 1452

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Wilburn C. ERVIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-6217.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 12, 1992.

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

Wilburn Ervin filed for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401, et seq. His application was eventually denied by the Secretary and he thereafter sought review in federal court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The district court upheld the Secretary's decision and this appeal followed. The parties have briefed the issues and have agreed to waive oral argument.

Upon consideration, we find no reason to overturn the district court's judgment. Our review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) is limited to determining whether the Secretary's decision is supported by substantial evidence. Ervin's specific burden was to prove that he became disabled prior to the expiration of insured status. Moon v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1175, 1182 (6th Cir.1990). The record before us amply supports the Secretary's determination. There is substantial evidence that Ervin was not completely disabled and that a sufficient number of jobs existed in the economy which he was capable of performing.

Accordingly, the district court's judgment is affirmed. Rule 9(b)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

966 F.2d 1452

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Wilburn C. ERVIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-6217.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 12, 1992.

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

Wilburn Ervin filed for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401, et seq. His application was eventually denied by the Secretary and he thereafter sought review in federal court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The district court upheld the Secretary's decision and this appeal followed. The parties have briefed the issues and have agreed to waive oral argument.

Upon consideration, we find no reason to overturn the district court's judgment. Our review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) is limited to determining whether the Secretary's decision is supported by substantial evidence. Ervin's specific burden was to prove that he became disabled prior to the expiration of insured status. Moon v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1175, 1182 (6th Cir.1990). The record before us amply supports the Secretary's determination. There is substantial evidence that Ervin was not completely disabled and that a sufficient number of jobs existed in the economy which he was capable of performing.

Accordingly, the district court's judgment is affirmed. Rule 9(b)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

966 F.2d 1452, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22615, 1992 WL 133027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilburn-c-ervin-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-se-ca6-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack