Wilbur v. Jones
86 A. 769, 80 N.J. Eq. 520, 10 Buchanan 520, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 365
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for tire reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court .below by Vice-Chancellor Walker, but without costs.
For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Treacy—12.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilbur v. Jones, 86 A. 769, 80 N.J. Eq. 520, 10 Buchanan 520, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 365 (N.J. 1912).
86 A. 769 (Wilbur v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Westervelt v. Gateway Financial Service
464 A.2d 1203 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)
Mariner of Pennsville, Inc. v. S.T.G. Enterprises, Inc. (In Re S.T.G. Enterprises, Inc.)
24 B.R. 173 (D. New Jersey, 1982)
Talcott, Inc. v. ROTO AMERICAN CORP.
302 A.2d 147 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)
Applegate v. Quackenbush
61 A.2d 577 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)
Wade v. Cox
172 A. 215 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)
First Nat. Bank of Ardmore v. Gillam
1927 OK 402 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1927)