Wilbur Residents for a Clean Neighborhood v. Department of Environmental Quality

30 P.3d 1228, 176 Or. App. 353, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1267
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 29, 2001
Docket98CV0649CC; A109651
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 P.3d 1228 (Wilbur Residents for a Clean Neighborhood v. Department of Environmental Quality) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilbur Residents for a Clean Neighborhood v. Department of Environmental Quality, 30 P.3d 1228, 176 Or. App. 353, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1267 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is a judicial review of permits that the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) issued authorizing intervenor Heard Farms, Inc., to apply reclaimed wastewater and biosolids to certain land. The permits were final orders in other than a contested case and the trial court therefore had jurisdiction under ORS 183.484. The trial court granted petitioners’ motion for summary judgment and held that the orders were invalid because they failed to include findings of fact. It remanded the case to DEQ for the entry of new orders. The trial court erred in requiring findings of fact in the orders, and we reverse its judgment. Norden v. Water Resources Dept., 329 Or 641, 648-49, 996 P2d 958 (2000). We also necessarily vacate the court’s award of attorney fees to petitioners.

Petitioners cross-assign error to the trial court’s action in striking nine of their exhibits from the summary judgment record on the ground that the exhibits were not part of the record before DEQ when it issued the permits. That ground does not support the trial court’s decision. Norden, 329 Or at 649. DEQ argues that we should affirm the decision because the exhibits are irrelevant. Our decision will require further proceedings on remand, and the issues that arise in those proceedings may affect the relevance of the exhibits. We therefore leave all questions concerning the admissibility of the exhibits to the trial court, subject to our review on any subsequent appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riverkeepers v. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
230 P.3d 559 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 P.3d 1228, 176 Or. App. 353, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilbur-residents-for-a-clean-neighborhood-v-department-of-environmental-orctapp-2001.