Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC v. Erikson

District Court, D. South Dakota·Decided September 15, 2023·No. 4:23-cv-04058·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY, LLC, 4:23-CV-04058-LLP Plaintiff, ORDER vs. KEVIN ERIKSON and J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY, Defendants. On August 28, 2023, this Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order finding Defendant Kevin Erikson (“Erikson”) in civil contempt for violating provisions of this Court’s June 13, 2023, Order for a Preliminary Injunction. (Doc. 72.) The Court held that civil contempt sanctions are warranted. Plaintiff, Wilbur-Ellis Company, LLC, Inc., (“Wilbur-Ellis”), was directed to submit documentation of its reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in seeking to enforce the Preliminary Injunction. Wilbur-Ellis has submitted a Petition for Attorneys’ Fees, a Declaration of Jeremy Sosna setting forth Wilbur-Ellis’s support for its Petition, and copies of the lawyers’ billing records. (Doc. 73.) Wilbur-Ellis seeks $43,746.50 in attorney fees. This was calculated by multiplying the number of hours worked by the billing rates of the lawyers involved. (Doc. 73-1.) The Court is aware of the principles pertaining to attorney fee awards. See Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983). The hours expended and the hourly rates of Wilbur-Ellis’s lawyers are well-documented. However, courts have considerable discretion to fashion an appropriate remedy for contempt. See Hartman v. Lyng, 884 F.2d 1103, 1106 (8th Cir. 1989). After careful consideration of all relevant factors in this case, including the nature of Erikson’s violations of the Preliminary Injunction and the extent of the harm suffered by Wilbur-Ellis, the Court finds that requiring Erikson to pay $10,000 of Wilbur-Ellis’s attorney fees is sufficient to sanction Erikson for his contempt and to ensure his compliance with the Preliminary Injunction. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiffs Petition for Attorneys’ Fees is granted as to a portion of the fees requested. (Doc. 73). 2. That, on or before Monday, October 2, 2023, Kevin Erikson shall pay $10,000 to Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC as a sanction for being held in contempt of the Order granting a preliminary injunction issued by this Court on June 13, 2023. Dated this {Sis of September, 2023. Y THE COURT: Kuen (Kui su wrence L. Piersol United States District Judge ATTEST: MATTHEW W. THELEN, CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC v. Erikson, (D.S.D. 2023).

Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC v. Erikson (Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC v. Erikson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hensley v. Eckerhart
461 U.S. 424 (Supreme Court, 1983)
Hartman v. Lyng
884 F.2d 1103 (Eighth Circuit, 1989)