Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 212
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 Cust. Ct. 155
United States Customs Court·Decided July 7, 1955·No. No. 59216; protest 217067-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the merchandise, consisting of 90 cartons of solid tuna fish in lot No. 158, covered by entry 745569, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was in fact not received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise 'as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 212 (cusc 1955).

35 Cust. Ct. 212 (Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.