Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. United States
This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 212 (Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the merchandise, consisting of 90 cartons of solid tuna fish in lot No. 158, covered by entry 745569, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was in fact not received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise 'as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Cust. Ct. 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilbur-ellis-co-v-united-states-cusc-1955.