Wilbur E. Thomas v. Akin Equipment, Inc.

Fifth Circuit

Wilbur E. Thomas v. Akin Equipment, Inc.

309 F.2d 331

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 7, 1962

Docket19725

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 309 F.2d 331 (Wilbur E. Thomas v. Akin Equipment, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilbur E. Thomas v. Akin Equipment, Inc., 309 F.2d 331 (5th Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This negligence action was submitted to the jury without a motion for directed verdict and resulted in a verdict for defendant. The trial court denied a motion for new trial. The evidence was conflicting and a jury question was presented. Appellant is bound. Baten v. Kirby Lumber Company, 5 Cir., 1939, 103 F.2d 272; Stokes v. Continental Assurance Co., 5 Cir., 1957, 242 F.2d 893; and Greyhound Corporation v. Dewey, 5 Cir., 1957, 240 F.2d 899.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This negligence action was submitted to the jury without a motion for directed verdict and resulted in a verdict for defendant. The trial court denied a motion for new trial. The evidence was conflicting and a jury question was presented. Appellant is bound. Baten v. Kirby Lumber Company, 5 Cir., 1939, 103 F.2d 272; Stokes v. Continental Assurance Co., 5 Cir., 1957, 242 F.2d 893; and Greyhound Corporation v. Dewey, 5 Cir., 1957, 240 F.2d 899.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 F.2d 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilbur-e-thomas-v-akin-equipment-inc-ca5-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack