Wilbert Thomas v. City of Huntington, West Virginia, Municipal Corporation

21 F.3d 424, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15844, 1994 WL 83797
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 1994
Docket93-7330
StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 424 (Wilbert Thomas v. City of Huntington, West Virginia, Municipal Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilbert Thomas v. City of Huntington, West Virginia, Municipal Corporation, 21 F.3d 424, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15844, 1994 WL 83797 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

21 F.3d 424
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Wilbert THOMAS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON, West Virginia, Municipal Corporation,
Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-7330.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Charles H. Haden, II, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-764-3)

Wilbert Thomas, appellant pro se.

Frederick George Staker, III, City Attorney's Office, Huntington, W VA, for appellee.

S.D.W.VA.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thomas v. City of Huntington, No. CA-93-764-3 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 21, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 F.3d 424, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15844, 1994 WL 83797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilbert-thomas-v-city-of-huntington-west-virginia--ca4-1994.