Wilbert Knight v. Reubart, et al.
Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6| WILBERT KNIGHT, Case No. 2:24-cv-01842-GMN-NJK 7 Plaintiff, gly. Order REUBART, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 It appears that Plaintiff has moved without updating the mailing address on the docket. See Docket No. 16. “A party, not the district court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised 13] of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see 14] also in re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the local rules require that 15] litigants immediately file with the Court written notification of any change of address, and 16] expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3- 17} 1. 18 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by 19] November 21, 2025. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN 20] DISMISSAL. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: November 12, 2025 he. Nancy J. Koppe* 24 United States Magistrate Judge
26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilbert Knight v. Reubart, et al. (Wilbert Knight v. Reubart, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.