Wilber v. Scaff
This text of 2019 ND 281 (Wilber v. Scaff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 12/12/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2019 ND 281
McKiley Wilber, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Sarah Scaff, Defendant and Appellee
No. 20190196
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jennifer M. Gooss, Beulah, N.D., for plaintiff and appellant.
Matthew J. Arthurs, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellee. Wilber v. Scaff No. 20190196
[¶1] McKiley Wilber appeals from a district court judgment granting Sarah Scaff primary residential responsibility of their child. On appeal, Wilber argues the district court’s findings were clearly erroneous. He also argues the district court abused its discretion by allocating to him all costs of transporting the child and by not taking judicial notice of the criminal history of Scaff’s former live-in boyfriend. We conclude the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous and it did not abuse its discretion. Therefore, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 ND 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilber-v-scaff-nd-2019.