Wilber Lee Barker v. Deputy Director, Department of Corrections Edward C. Morris
This text of 60 F.3d 820 (Wilber Lee Barker v. Deputy Director, Department of Corrections Edward C. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 F.3d 820
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Wilber Lee BARKER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT of CORRECTIONS; Edward C.
Morris, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-6486.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 13, 1995.
Wilber Lee Barker, appellant pro se.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barker v. Deputy Director, Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-94-1576-AM (E.D.Va. Feb. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 820, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24733, 1995 WL 419958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilber-lee-barker-v-deputy-director-department-of--ca4-1995.