Wilbanks v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wilbanks v. State

135 S.E. 493, 36 Ga. App. 93, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 784

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 9, 1926

Docket17540

StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 493 (Wilbanks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilbanks v. State, 135 S.E. 493, 36 Ga. App. 93, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 784 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show no cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. While evidence adduced upon the trial amply authorized the defendant’s acquittal, there was other evidence which authorized his conviction; and, the finding of the jury against him having been approved by the trial judge, and no error of law upon the trial appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show no cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. While evidence adduced upon the trial amply authorized the defendant’s acquittal, there was other evidence which authorized his conviction; and, the finding of the jury against him having been approved by the trial judge, and no error of law upon the trial appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 S.E. 493, 36 Ga. App. 93, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilbanks-v-state-gactapp-1926.