Wilansky v. United States

326 F. Supp. 3d 784

District Court, D. Maine·Decided August 27, 2018·No. Case No. 18-cv-0316 (WMW/TNL)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Based on the Court's analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED :

1. Petitioner Sophia Wilansky's motion for the return of seized property, (Dkt. 10), is DENIED .

2. Respondents' motion to dismiss, (Dkt. 29), is GRANTED .

3. Petitioner Sophia Wilansky's complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Based on the Court's analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED :

1. Petitioner Sophia Wilansky's motion for the return of seized property, (Dkt. 10), is DENIED .

2. Respondents' motion to dismiss, (Dkt. 29), is GRANTED .

3. Petitioner Sophia Wilansky's complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Wilansky v. United States, 326 F. Supp. 3d 784 (D. Me. 2018).

Pincite

326 F. Supp. 3d 784 (Wilansky v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.