Wikoff v. Perot

1 Yeates 38

• Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
• Decided: July 15, 1791
• Status: Published

Opinion

Case. Defendant’s counsel moved to withdraw their plea of non-assumpsit, and rely on their plea of payment alone, (apparently to have the benefit of conclusion to the jury) but it was opposed as contrary to all practice. The court thought that the application was not made in time. They would not decide, that there was no case wherein a party might not be permitted to withdraw a plea at the bar; but this clearly cannot be done in the present instance.

Cited in i R., 347, in support of the decision that a plaintiff will not he permitted to discontinue, where it will give him an advantage, or tend to vex and oppress the defendant. By the Act of March 21, 1806, a defendant may alter his plea or defence on or before the trial of the caijse.