Wikle v. Avary
This text of 76 S.E. 1039 (Wikle v. Avary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Tlie answer in this ease, properly construed, does not allege that the minimum capital stock of the corporation therein referred to ' had not been subscribed.
2. No part of the capital stock of a corporation need be paid in .before the charter is granted and the corporation begins business as a legal entity. Bing v. Bank of Kingston, 5 Ga. App. 578 (6), (63 S. E. 652).
3. The act of a corporation in selling and indorsing over to'a third person a note, given in payment of a subscription to its capital stock, is not an exercise of “the privileges conferred by the charter,” within the meaning of section 2823 (3) of the Civil Code of 1910.
4-, A suit upon a note given in payment of a subscription to the capital . stock in a corporation can not be defeated by proof that -ten per cent, of the capital stock has not been paid in. The purpose of such a suit is to obtain a compliance with the provisions of the statute, so as to [149]*149enable the corporation to commence the exercise of the privileges' conferred by the charter. Branch v. Glass Works, 95 Ga. 573 (23 8. E. 128).
5. To an action on a stock-subscription note it is no defense that the corporation has accepted from other subscribers, in payment of their subscriptions, property of a value less than the amount of such subscriptions.
6. There was no error in striking the answer and entering judgment for the plaintiff. . Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 S.E. 1039, 12 Ga. App. 148, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wikle-v-avary-gactapp-1913.