Wijesekera (Royce) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
This text of Wijesekera (Royce) v. Dist. Ct. (State) (Wijesekera (Royce) v. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
to include the sentence enhancements, see NRS 173.095 (providing that an information may be amended at any time before the verdict or finding "if no additional or different offense is charged and if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced"); Phipps v. State, 111 Nev. 1276, 1279, 903 P.2d 820, 822 (1995) (observing that oral amendments to a complaint or information are permissible "where they are detailed and specific and are eventually memorialized"). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
J. Pal-raguirre
r----7\-e--14,4 Douglas
cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court, Dept. 20 Pitaro & Fumo, Chtd. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) (94Th (404.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wijesekera (Royce) v. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wijesekera-royce-v-dist-ct-state-nev-2015.