Wihly Harpo v. Intermark Management
This text of Wihly Harpo v. Intermark Management (Wihly Harpo v. Intermark Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ July 27, 2021
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A21D0409. WIHLY HARPO v. INTERMARK MANAGEMENT.
Wihly Harpo, proceeding pro se, filed this application for discretionary review, seeking to appeal an order entered by the Richmond County Magistrate Court in a dispossessory action. We lack jurisdiction. “The only avenue of appeal available from [a] magistrate court judgment is provided by OCGA § 15-10-41 (b) (1), which allows for a de novo appeal to the state or superior court.” Handler v. Hulsey, 199 Ga. App. 751, 751 (406 SE2d 225) (1991). Thus, this Court may address magistrate court matters only if they have already been reviewed by the state or superior court. See Westwind Corp. v. Washington Fed. S & L Assn., 195 Ga. App. 411, 411 (1) (393 SE2d 479) (1990). Absent an appealable state or superior court order, we are unable to obtain jurisdiction over this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/27/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wihly Harpo v. Intermark Management, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wihly-harpo-v-intermark-management-gactapp-2021.