Wihly Harpo v. Intermark Management

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 27, 2021·No. A21D0409·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 27, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0409. WIHLY HARPO v. INTERMARK MANAGEMENT.

Wihly Harpo, proceeding pro se, filed this application for discretionary review, seeking to appeal an order entered by the Richmond County Magistrate Court in a dispossessory action. We lack jurisdiction.

“The only avenue of appeal available from [a] magistrate court judgment is provided by OCGA § 15-10-41 (b) (1), which allows for a de novo appeal to the state or superior court.” Handler v. Hulsey, 199 Ga. App. 751, 751 (406 SE2d 225) (1991). Thus, this Court may address magistrate court matters only if they have already been reviewed by the state or superior court. See Westwind Corp. v. Washington Fed. S & L Assn., 195 Ga. App. 411, 411 (1) (393 SE2d 479) (1990). Absent an appealable state or superior court order, we are unable to obtain jurisdiction over this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/27/2021

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wihly Harpo v. Intermark Management, (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).

Wihly Harpo v. Intermark Management (Wihly Harpo v. Intermark Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Westwind Corporation v. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Association
393 S.E.2d 479 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Handler v. Hulsey
406 S.E.2d 225 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)