Wigton v. Brainerd

28 F. 29, 24 Blatchf. 18, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2204
United States Circuit Court·Decided July 8, 1886·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

This suit was dismissed, with costs, for want of pros* edition. The defendant claims a docket fee of S20 as a part of the costs to be taxed, which the clerk has disallowed. This whole subject is carefully examined, and all the cases up to that time, bearing upon it, are reviewed, by Mr. Justice Blatcheoed, in Wooster v. Handy, 23 Fed. Rep. 49. The conclusiones there reached that this docket fee in such cases is not taxable. That case is controlling here, notwithstanding the different views expressed by Judge Hammond in Partee v. Thomas, 27 Fed. Rep. 429.

Taxation of clerk affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wigton v. Brainerd, 28 F. 29, 24 Blatchf. 18, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2204 (uscirct 1886).

28 F. 29 (Wigton v. Brainerd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peerless Light Co. v. Leviton
247 F. 606 (S.D. New York, 1916)