Wigley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Wigley v. State

126 So. 927, 23 Ala. App. 687

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 11, 1930·No. 7 Div. 571.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

There is but one question of merit presented by this record, to wit, the refusal of the court to grant the defendant’s motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the great weight of the evidence.

As to the guilt vel non of the defendant, there was little dispute, and, as to the venue, >. the evidence was in such conflict as to make that a question for the jury. We will not disturb their finding. There is no error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

There is but one question of merit presented by this record, to wit, the refusal of the court to grant the defendant’s motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the great weight of the evidence.

As to the guilt vel non of the defendant, there was little dispute, and, as to the venue, >. the evidence was in such conflict as to make that a question for the jury. We will not disturb their finding. There is no error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Wigley v. State, 126 So. 927, 23 Ala. App. 687 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

126 So. 927 (Wigley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.