Wigley ex rel. Wigley v. Cochran

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wigley ex rel. Wigley v. Cochran

684 So. 2d 340, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13390, 1996 WL 734803

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 26, 1996

DocketNos. 95-1901, 95-2617

StatusPublished

This text of 684 So. 2d 340 (Wigley ex rel. Wigley v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wigley ex rel. Wigley v. Cochran, 684 So. 2d 340, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13390, 1996 WL 734803 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error in the four points that they raised in this appeal. One point does, however, merit some comment. In Point I, appellants contend that they should be granted a new trial based upon alleged prejudicial comments made by appellees’ counsel during the course of trial. The record shows that appel-lees’ counsel’s comments during his opening [341]*341statement were relevant to the reason for appellee leaving the scene of the accident, were invited by appellants and were not made to prejudice the jury. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

DELL, WARNER, JJ., and KENNEY, SCOTT M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error in the four points that they raised in this appeal. One point does, however, merit some comment. In Point I, appellants contend that they should be granted a new trial based upon alleged prejudicial comments made by appellees’ counsel during the course of trial. The record shows that appel-lees’ counsel’s comments during his opening [341]*341statement were relevant to the reason for appellee leaving the scene of the accident, were invited by appellants and were not made to prejudice the jury. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

DELL, WARNER, JJ., and KENNEY, SCOTT M., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

684 So. 2d 340, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13390, 1996 WL 734803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wigley-ex-rel-wigley-v-cochran-fladistctapp-1996.