Wightman v. Schleifer

18 N.Y.S. 551, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 698, 63 Hun 633
New York Supreme Court·Decided March 31, 1892·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Assuming that the release from the defendant’s wife to the defendant, executed November 13, 1890, was at all effectual, on the delivery of that release, the defendant became the owner of the property, and his wife became entitled to her dower therein. The right of dower does not depend •upon any agreement between the parties, but is an incident of an estate in fee simple. The moment such an estate vests in the husband, the wife’s inchoate right of dower attaches thereto, and such right of dower existed at the time of the attempted conveyance by the defendant to the plaintiff. The plaintiff is therefore entitled to judgment, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wightman v. Schleifer, 18 N.Y.S. 551, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 698, 63 Hun 633 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

18 N.Y.S. 551 (Wightman v. Schleifer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Shulenburg
114 Misc. 155 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1921)