Wightman v. Hastings

4 Mass. 244
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1808·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

(absente Parsons, C. J.) The words of the statute are too clear to leave a doubt. It is absurd to say that the parties may by their agreement evade a positive and very wholesome pro vision of a statute. The case is clearly within the provision, and to decide otherwise would be to make law, not to explain and administer it. The plaintiff is entitled to his costs before the appeal and the defendant is entitled to his costs since the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wightman v. Hastings, 4 Mass. 244 (Mass. 1808).

4 Mass. 244 (Wightman v. Hastings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ransom v. McCurley
140 Ill. 626 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1892)
Maine Bank v. Smith
18 Me. 99 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1841)
Inhabitants of Boston v. Inhabitants of York
1 Me. 406 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1821)
Woodworth v. President, Directors, & Co. of the Bank of America
19 Johns. 391 (New York Supreme Court, 1821)
Lakeman v. Morse
9 Mass. 126 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1812)