Wightman v. Consol. Rail Corp.
690 N.E.2d 16, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1445, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 494
This text of 690 N.E.2d 16 (Wightman v. Consol. Rail Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wightman v. Consol. Rail Corp., 690 N.E.2d 16, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1445, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 494 (Ohio 1998).
Opinion
Erie App. No. E-97-001. (Appeal of Darlene M. Wightman and The Michelle Wightman Charitable Foundation; and cross-appeal of Consolidated Rail Corporation.)
The discretionary appeal is allowed.
The discretionary cross-appeal is allowed.
The motion for admission pro hac vice of Ralph G. Wellington and Nancy Winkelman is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
690 N.E.2d 16, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1445, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wightman-v-consol-rail-corp-ohio-1998.