Wight v. City of Chicago
This text of 84 N.E. 628 (Wight v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court:
This case was tried by the court, by agreement, without a jury, upon a stipulation as to the facts. There was no ruling of the court upon the admission or exclusion of evidence and no written propositions to be held as law were submitted to the court in accordance with the provisions of the Practice act, therefore no question of law is presented by the record for our consideration. Jacobson v. Liverpool and London and Globe Ins. Co. 231 Ill. 61; Swain v. First Nat. Bank, 201 id. 416; Grabbs v. City of Danville, 166 id. 441; Bolton v. Johnston, 163 id. 234.
The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 N.E. 628, 234 Ill. 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wight-v-city-of-chicago-ill-1908.