Wight v. City of Chicago

84 N.E. 628, 234 Ill. 83
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 1908·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dunn

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case was tried by the court, by agreement, without a jury, upon a stipulation as to the facts. There was no ruling of the court upon the admission or exclusion of evidence and no written propositions to be held as law were submitted to the court in accordance with the provisions of the Practice act, therefore no question of law is presented by the record for our consideration. Jacobson v. Liverpool and London and Globe Ins. Co. 231 Ill. 61; Swain v. First Nat. Bank, 201 id. 416; Grabbs v. City of Danville, 166 id. 441; Bolton v. Johnston, 163 id. 234.

The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wight v. City of Chicago, 84 N.E. 628, 234 Ill. 83 (Ill. 1908).

84 N.E. 628 (Wight v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis v. Drainage Commissioners of Drainage District No. 1
188 Ill. App. 49 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1914)
Goodheart v. Hall
145 Ill. App. 604 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1908)