Wighard v. State

34 So. 3d 782, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7221, 2010 WL 1923978
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 2010·No. 5D09-4560·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Wright v. State, 911 So.2d 81, 83 (Fla.2005) (holding that imposition of an upward departure sentence without written reasons is not an issue cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) proceeding); Jackson v. State, 29 So.3d 1152 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (same); Wood v. State, 830 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (same).

GRIFFIN, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wighard v. State, 34 So. 3d 782, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7221, 2010 WL 1923978 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

34 So. 3d 782 (Wighard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vandyke v. State
76 So. 3d 1077 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Wighard v. State
71 So. 3d 170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Suarez v. State
34 So. 3d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)