Wigham v. Rhay

358 P.2d 316, 57 Wash. 2d 908
Washington Supreme Court·Decided January 12, 1961·No. No. 35295·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— Upon the authority of In re Wakefield v. Rhay, ante p. 168, 356 P. (2d) 596 and In re Aichele v. Rhay, ante p. 178, 356 P. (2d) 326, the writ of habeas corpus herein is granted; the judgment of conviction is vacated; and the petitioner is remanded to King County for a rearraignment and further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinions in the Wakefield, supra, and Aichele, supra, cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wigham v. Rhay, 358 P.2d 316, 57 Wash. 2d 908 (Wash. 1961).

358 P.2d 316 (Wigham v. Rhay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In RE WAKEFIELD v. Rhay
356 P.2d 596 (Washington Supreme Court, 1960)
In RE AICHELE v. Rhay
356 P.2d 326 (Washington Supreme Court, 1960)