Wigham v. Rhay
358 P.2d 316, 57 Wash. 2d 908
This text of 358 P.2d 316 (Wigham v. Rhay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wigham v. Rhay, 358 P.2d 316, 57 Wash. 2d 908 (Wash. 1961).
Opinion
— Upon the authority of In re Wakefield v. Rhay, ante p. 168, 356 P. (2d) 596 and In re Aichele v. Rhay, ante p. 178, 356 P. (2d) 326, the writ of habeas corpus herein is granted; the judgment of conviction is vacated; and the petitioner is remanded to King County for a rearraignment and further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinions in the Wakefield, supra, and Aichele, supra, cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In RE WAKEFIELD v. Rhay
356 P.2d 596 (Washington Supreme Court, 1960)
In RE AICHELE v. Rhay
356 P.2d 326 (Washington Supreme Court, 1960)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
358 P.2d 316, 57 Wash. 2d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wigham-v-rhay-wash-1961.