Wiggs v. State

952 So. 2d 610, 2007 WL 914678
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 2007
Docket2D04-5129
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 952 So. 2d 610 (Wiggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wiggs v. State, 952 So. 2d 610, 2007 WL 914678 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

952 So.2d 610 (2007)

James WIGGS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D04-5129.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 28, 2007.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anne S. Weiner, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

STRINGER, Judge.

We affirm Wiggs' convictions and sentences without prejudice to Wiggs filing a timely and facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Lepper v. State, 826 So.2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Affirmed.

CANADY, J., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Jr., Senior Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kranias v. Tsiogas
952 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
952 So. 2d 610, 2007 WL 914678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiggs-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.