Wiggins v. Young

167 F.2d 761, 83 U.S. App. D.C. 397, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2497
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 26, 1948·No. No. 9756·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order dismissing a complaint for an injunction to restrain the Board of Public Welfare of the District of Columbia from closing one of the child day care centers it has operated under general statutory authority to operate not more than 14. 60 Stat. 540, as amended, 60 Stat. 894; Pub.L. No. 123, 80th Cong., 1st Sess., 61 Stat. 188; Pub.L. No. 237, 80th Cong., 1st Sess., 61 Stat. 425. The Board’s decision is plainly within its discretion. We regret the resulting hardship to the appellants, but we have no authority to substitute our discretion for that of the Board and no reason to assume that our discretion, if exercised, would lead to a different result.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiggins v. Young, 167 F.2d 761, 83 U.S. App. D.C. 397, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2497 (D.C. Cir. 1948).

167 F.2d 761 (Wiggins v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.