Wiggins v. State

353 S.W.3d 662, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 2011 WL 3586500
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 16, 2011
DocketED 94658
StatusPublished

This text of 353 S.W.3d 662 (Wiggins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wiggins v. State, 353 S.W.3d 662, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 2011 WL 3586500 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnny Wiggins (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gooch v. State
353 S.W.3d 662 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
353 S.W.3d 662, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 2011 WL 3586500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiggins-v-state-moctapp-2011.