Wiggins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wiggins v. State

353 S.W.3d 662, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 2011 WL 3586500

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 2011·No. ED 94658·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnny Wiggins (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnny Wiggins (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Wiggins v. State, 353 S.W.3d 662, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 2011 WL 3586500 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

353 S.W.3d 662 (Wiggins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related