Wiggins v. State

125 S.E. 608, 33 Ga. App. 168, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 795
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 9, 1924
Docket15957
StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E. 608 (Wiggins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wiggins v. State, 125 S.E. 608, 33 Ga. App. 168, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 795 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Beoyles, O. J.

The venue of the offense was sufficiently proved, the evidence authorized the verdict, and none of the grounds of the motion for a new trial shows reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur. Jere M. Moore, for plaintiff in error. <7. B. Wall, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 608, 33 Ga. App. 168, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiggins-v-state-gactapp-1924.