Wiggins v. State

773 So. 2d 1259, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16624, 2000 WL 1854105
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wiggins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 790 So. 2d 1137
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 2000·No. No. 3D99-2323·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lloyd Rene Wiggins appeals his conviction for attempted second degree murder. The sole claim of error is the admission of hearsay evidence over defendant’s objection. We conclude that the objection was properly overruled, as the statement was admitted for impeachment purposes. See § 90.608(1), Fla.Stat. (1999); Ellis v. State, 622 So.2d 991, 996 (Fla.1993); Lopez v. State, 716 So.2d 301, 304-05 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). The court gave an appropriate limiting instruction, explaining the limited purpose for which the hearsay testimony was being introduced. The conviction is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiggins v. State, 773 So. 2d 1259, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16624, 2000 WL 1854105 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

773 So. 2d 1259 (Wiggins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lopez v. State
716 So. 2d 301 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Ellis v. State
622 So. 2d 991 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)