Wiggins v. State
This text of Wiggins v. State (Wiggins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
MICHAEL WIGGINS, § § No. 258, 2018 Defendant Below- § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Cr. ID N1412002182 Plaintiff Below- § Appellee. §
Submitted: August 28, 2018 Decided: August 29, 2018
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.
ORDER
We have considered the State’s motion to remand for reconsideration of the
defendant’s motion for modification of sentence. The State contends that the Superior
Court, at the 2016 sentencing hearing, agreed to retain jurisdiction to consider modifying
the defendant’s sentence if he completed a GED program. The State thus concedes error
in the Superior Court’s rejection of the defendant’s motion as procedurally barred.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the
Superior Court to consider the merits of the defendant’s motion. Jurisdiction is not
retained.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wiggins v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiggins-v-state-del-2018.