Wiggins v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Wiggins v. State

93 So. 927, 18 Ala. App. 699

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 30, 1922

Docket1 Div. 457.

StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 927 (Wiggins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wiggins v. State, 93 So. 927, 18 Ala. App. 699 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was convicted of a violation of the prohibition laws and he appeals. The court has read and considered the evidence contained in this record, and we are of the opinion that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant a conviction. The general affirmative charge, requested by the defendant, should have been given. The judgment of conviction is reversed, and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was convicted of a violation of the prohibition laws and he appeals. The court has read and considered the evidence contained in this record, and we are of the opinion that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant a conviction. The general affirmative charge, requested by the defendant, should have been given. The judgment of conviction is reversed, and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 So. 927, 18 Ala. App. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiggins-v-state-alactapp-1922.