Wiggins v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Wiggins v. State

93 So. 927, 18 Ala. App. 699

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 30, 1922·No. 1 Div. 457.·Published

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was convicted of a violation of the prohibition laws and he appeals. The court has read and considered the evidence contained in this record, and we are of the opinion that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant a conviction. The general affirmative charge, requested by the defendant, should have been given. The judgment of conviction is reversed, and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was convicted of a violation of the prohibition laws and he appeals. The court has read and considered the evidence contained in this record, and we are of the opinion that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant a conviction. The general affirmative charge, requested by the defendant, should have been given. The judgment of conviction is reversed, and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Wiggins v. State, 93 So. 927, 18 Ala. App. 699 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

93 So. 927 (Wiggins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.