Wietelmann v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Wietelmann v. State

1913 OK CR 329, 133 P. 249, 10 Okla. Crim. 638, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 248

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 12, 1913

DocketNo. A-1737.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 329 (Wietelmann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wietelmann v. State, 1913 OK CR 329, 133 P. 249, 10 Okla. Crim. 638, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 248 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

*639 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted under an information which charged the unlawful selling of intoxicating liquor, and on the 19th day of January, 1912, he was sentenced in accordance with the verdict of the jury to be confined for thirty days in the county jail and pay a fine of fifty dollars. No brief has been filed or oral argument made in behalf of the defendant. When the cause was called for final submission the Attorney General for this reason moved to affirm. The motion to affirm is sustained and the cause remanded with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*639 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted under an information which charged the unlawful selling of intoxicating liquor, and on the 19th day of January, 1912, he was sentenced in accordance with the verdict of the jury to be confined for thirty days in the county jail and pay a fine of fifty dollars. No brief has been filed or oral argument made in behalf of the defendant. When the cause was called for final submission the Attorney General for this reason moved to affirm. The motion to affirm is sustained and the cause remanded with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 329, 133 P. 249, 10 Okla. Crim. 638, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wietelmann-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.