Wietelmann v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Wietelmann v. State

1913 OK CR 329, 133 P. 249, 10 Okla. Crim. 638, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 248

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided July 12, 1913·No. No. A-1737.·Published

Opinion

*639 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted under an information which charged the unlawful selling of intoxicating liquor, and on the 19th day of January, 1912, he was sentenced in accordance with the verdict of the jury to be confined for thirty days in the county jail and pay a fine of fifty dollars. No brief has been filed or oral argument made in behalf of the defendant. When the cause was called for final submission the Attorney General for this reason moved to affirm. The motion to affirm is sustained and the cause remanded with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*639 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted under an information which charged the unlawful selling of intoxicating liquor, and on the 19th day of January, 1912, he was sentenced in accordance with the verdict of the jury to be confined for thirty days in the county jail and pay a fine of fifty dollars. No brief has been filed or oral argument made in behalf of the defendant. When the cause was called for final submission the Attorney General for this reason moved to affirm. The motion to affirm is sustained and the cause remanded with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Wietelmann v. State, 1913 OK CR 329, 133 P. 249, 10 Okla. Crim. 638, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 248 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

1913 OK CR 329 (Wietelmann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.