Wiest v. Critsinger
This text of 4 Johns. 117 (Wiest v. Critsinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An adjournment made by the justice, absent from the place where the court was appointed to be held, and in the absence of the parties, and by a note in writing without his signature, was clearly not an adjournment of which the parties were bound to take notice.
The cause was, consequently, discontinued and out of court. The subsequent proceeding was null, and the judgment must be reversed.
Judgment reversed»
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Johns. 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiest-v-critsinger-nysupct-1809.