Wiesmann v. Shanley

102 N.W. 932, 124 Wis. 431, 1905 Wisc. LEXIS 96
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 14, 1905·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Dodge, J.

Orders striking out parts of pleadings were in some cases held appealable under subd. 4, sec. 3069, R. S. 1878, as involving “the merits of the action or some part thereof.” Freeman v. Engelmann T. Co. 36 Wis. 571; Carpenter v. Reynolds, 58 Wis. 666, 17 N. W. 300; Dewald v. Dewald, 89 Wis. 353, 62 N. W. 175. That subdivision was eliminated by ch. 212, Laws of 1895. Adamson v. Raymer. 94 Wis. 243, 250, 68 N. W. 1000. Since then no statute is claimed to confer appealability upon such orders, except, perhaps, subd. 1, sec. 3069, Stats. 1898. That, however, can-mot be effective, for the order, much as it may affect a substantial right, in no wise determines the action, nor prevents a judgment from which an appeal might be taken. Flannigan v. Lindgren, 102 Wis. 445, 100 N. W. 818. No statute authorizing the present appeal, we are without jurisdiction-to entertain it.

By the Gourt. — Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiesmann v. Shanley, 102 N.W. 932, 124 Wis. 431, 1905 Wisc. LEXIS 96 (Wis. 1905).

102 N.W. 932 (Wiesmann v. Shanley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gauger v. Ludwig
202 N.W.2d 233 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1972)
Town of Blooming Grove v. City of Madison
92 N.W.2d 224 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1958)
Britz v. Chilsen
78 N.W.2d 896 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1956)
Bolick v. Gallagher
63 N.W.2d 93 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1954)
First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee v. Carpenter
259 N.W. 836 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1935)
Gilbert v. Hoard
230 N.W. 720 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1930)
State v. Lewis
159 N.W. 746 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1916)
Gooding v. Doyle
115 N.W. 114 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1908)
Seattle & Northern Railway Co. v. Bowman
89 P. 399 (Washington Supreme Court, 1907)