Wiesmann v. Shanley
This text of 102 N.W. 932 (Wiesmann v. Shanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders striking out parts of pleadings were in some cases held appealable under subd. 4, sec. 3069, R. S. 1878, as involving “the merits of the action or some part thereof.” Freeman v. Engelmann T. Co. 36 Wis. 571; Carpenter v. Reynolds, 58 Wis. 666, 17 N. W. 300; Dewald v. Dewald, 89 Wis. 353, 62 N. W. 175. That subdivision was eliminated by ch. 212, Laws of 1895. Adamson v. Raymer. 94 Wis. 243, 250, 68 N. W. 1000. Since then no statute is claimed to confer appealability upon such orders, except, perhaps, subd. 1, sec. 3069, Stats. 1898. That, however, can-mot be effective, for the order, much as it may affect a substantial right, in no wise determines the action, nor prevents a judgment from which an appeal might be taken. Flannigan v. Lindgren, 102 Wis. 445, 100 N. W. 818. No statute authorizing the present appeal, we are without jurisdiction-to entertain it.
By the Gourt. — Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 N.W. 932, 124 Wis. 431, 1905 Wisc. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiesmann-v-shanley-wis-1905.