Wieska v. Imroth

43 Ill. App. 357, 1891 Ill. App. LEXIS 361
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided December 7, 1891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Waterman, P. J.

The statement .was not a compliance with the statute. It provides that the original contractor shall, whenever any payment of money shall become due from the owner, or whenever he desires to draw any money from the owner * * * on such contract, make out and give to the owner * * * a statement under oath, of the number, name of every subcontractor, mechanic or workmanin his employ or person furnishing materials, giving their names and the rate of wages, or the terms of contract, and how m/uch, if anything, is, due or to becom,e due to them or any of them for work done or material furnished. * * * Until the statement provided for in this section is made in manner and form as herein provided, the contractor shall have no right of action.

The judgment of the County Court that for lack of a statement in compliance with the statute the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wieska v. Imroth, 43 Ill. App. 357, 1891 Ill. App. LEXIS 361 (Ill. Ct. App. 1891).

43 Ill. App. 357 (Wieska v. Imroth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bonheim v. Meany
43 Ill. App. 532 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1892)