Wierzba v. Quality Loan Service, Corp.
This text of 419 F. App'x 727 (Wierzba v. Quality Loan Service, Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Steven Wierzba appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
The district court dismissed two claims in Wierzba’s amended complaint without prejudice and granted leave to amend. [728]*728Rather than filing a second amended complaint or obtaining a final order of dismissal from the district court, Wierzba filed a notice of appeal. We therefore lack jurisdiction. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136-37 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc) (a dismissal with leave to amend is not a final order).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 F. App'x 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wierzba-v-quality-loan-service-corp-ca9-2011.