Wiener v. Regent Brand Clothes, Inc.

204 Misc. 231, 122 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1953 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1835
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 23, 1953·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Examinations before trial in summary proceedings are contrary to the spirit and intent of the Legislature in providing the summary remedy (Dubowsky v. Goldsmith. 202 App. Div. 818).

The court had no jurisdiction to stay the summary proceedings before final order (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1446).

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, motion denied and stay vacated.

Schreiber and Hecht, JJ., concur in Per Curiam memorandum; Hofstadter, J., concurs in result solely on ground that in the particular circumstances of this case it was an abuse of discretion to grant order for examination; I do not regard the Dubowsky case as persuasive, nor, of course, is it controlling •— and in this view, in a proper case, the court would have jurisdiction to order an examination and, pending its completion, order a stay.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiener v. Regent Brand Clothes, Inc., 204 Misc. 231, 122 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1953 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

204 Misc. 231 (Wiener v. Regent Brand Clothes, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re St. Andrew Associates
57 Misc. 2d 1079 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1968)
Myers v. Blaise
18 A.D.2d 745 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
42 West 15th Street Corp. v. Friedman
208 Misc. 123 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)