Wiener v. Pope
479 So. 2d 320, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 21, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17372
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 17, 1985·No. No. 85-503·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Bart Wiener, a broker, brought an action to recover his commission for brokering a mortgage loan. The trial court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss on the stated basis that “since the construction mortgage loan contemplated by the commitment was never actually closed, the [complaint] failed to state a cause of action.” This case is factually indistinguishable from S & D Enterprises, Inc. v. Sonnenblick-Goldman Southeast Corp., 310 So.2d 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), and we reverse on that authority-
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wiener v. Pope, 479 So. 2d 320, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 21, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17372 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
479 So. 2d 320 (Wiener v. Pope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Prieto
479 So. 2d 320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)