Wiener v. Bloom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wiener v. Bloom

248 A.D. 557

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 557 (Wiener v. Bloom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wiener v. Bloom, 248 A.D. 557 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss complaint on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that plaintiffs have an adequate remedy at law reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days after service of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., MeAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.; O’Malley and Cohn, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss complaint on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that plaintiffs have an adequate remedy at law reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days after service of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., MeAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.; O’Malley and Cohn, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiener-v-bloom-nyappdiv-1936.