Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wiendl v. Wiendl

Wiendl v. Wiendl

255 So. 3d 836
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 2018·No. CASE NO.: 2D18-2380·Published

Opinion

The former husband's petition for writ of prohibition is denied. The former wife's motion for appellate attorney's fees is remanded to the trial court. If the former wife establishes her entitlement pursuant to section 61.16, Florida Statutes (2007), and Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997), the trial court is authorized to award her all or a portion of the reasonable appellate attorney's fees. See Rados v. Rados, 791 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 2d DCA2001).

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiendl v. Wiendl, 255 So. 3d 836 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

255 So. 3d 836 (Wiendl v. Wiendl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rados v. Rados
791 So. 2d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Rosen v. Rosen
696 So. 2d 697 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)