Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Wiemann v. Malloy

Wiemann v. Malloy

15 A.D.3d 671, 789 N.Y.S.2d 917, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2061
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 28, 2005
StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.3d 671 (Wiemann v. Malloy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wiemann v. Malloy, 15 A.D.3d 671, 789 N.Y.S.2d 917, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2061 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Christopher Malloy appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Marks, J.), dated April 7, 2004, which granted the petition for an order of protection upon his default in appearing.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order dated April 7, 2004, must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CFLR 5511; Lawrence v Sotudeh, 5 AD3d 445 [2004]). Schmidt, J.E, Santucci, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawrence v. Sotudeh
5 A.D.3d 445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.3d 671, 789 N.Y.S.2d 917, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiemann-v-malloy-nyappdiv-2005.