Wiele v. Kadzis

915 So. 2d 777, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19677, 2005 WL 3406344
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 2005·No. No. 1D05-2739·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order determining that the trial court possessed jurisdiction over the appellant. Proceedings to modify the amount of alimony awarded pursuant to a divorce decree are supplemental to the original proceedings and, consequently, the trial court retains jurisdiction over the parties. See Stickney v. Stickney, 377 So.2d 187 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)(“Timely proceedings to increase the amount of alimony awarded by a judgment in a dissolution of marriage action are supplemental to the judgment and are merely a continuation of the original proceedings. The parties having been properly brought within the jurisdiction of the trial court at the outset, the modification proceedings may be brought on a reasonable notice which affords an opportunity to be heard.”).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN; C.J., BROWNING and HAWKES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiele v. Kadzis, 915 So. 2d 777, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19677, 2005 WL 3406344 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

915 So. 2d 777 (Wiele v. Kadzis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Walker
80 So. 3d 1128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)