Wieland-Werke Ag v. United States
This text of Wieland-Werke Ag v. United States (Wieland-Werke Ag v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1141
WIELAND-WERKE AG, PRYMETALL GMBH & CO. KG, SCHWERMETALL HALBZEUGWERK GMBH & CO. KG, and WIELAND METALS, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
EAGLE BRASS CO., HEYCO METALS, INC., LUVATA BUFFALO, INC. (now known as Luvata North America, Inc.), OLIN CORPORATION-BRASS GROUP (now known as Global Brass and Copper, Inc.), PMX INDUSTRIES, INC., REVERE COPPER PRODUCTS, INC., and SCOTT BRASS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Michael T. Shor, Arnold & Porter, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs- appellants.
Charles A. St. Charles, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. With him on the brief were James M. Lyons, General Counsel, and Andrea C. Casson, Assistant General Counsel for Litigation.
Kathleen W. Cannon, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Eagle Brass Co., et al. With her on the brief were David A. Hartquist and Jeffrey S. Beckington.
Appealed from: United States Court of International Trade
Judge Evan J. Wallach NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1141
WIELAND-WERKE AG, PRYMETALL GMBH & CO. KG, SCHWERMETALL HALBZEUGWERK GMBH & CO. KG, and WIELAND METALS, INC.,
EAGLE BRASS CO., HEYCO METALS, INC., LUVATA BUFFALO, INC. (now known as Luvata North America, Inc.), OLIN CORPORATION-BRASS GROUP (now known as Global Brass and Copper, Inc.), PMX INDUSTRIES, INC., REVERE COPPER PRODUCTS, INC., and SCOTT BRASS,
Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States Court of International Trade
In CASE NO(S). 06-00135.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam: (MAYER, LOURIE and SCHALL, Circuit Judges):
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATE: August 12, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wieland-Werke Ag v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wieland-werke-ag-v-united-states-cafc-2008.