Wiedmer v. New York Elevated Railroad

3 N.Y. St. Rep. 678
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 12, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.Y. St. Rep. 678 (Wiedmer v. New York Elevated Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wiedmer v. New York Elevated Railroad, 3 N.Y. St. Rep. 678 (N.Y. 1886).

Opinion

Danforth, J.

Motion to dismiss appeal is put upon the sole ground that this court has not jurisdiction. The con[679]*679trary is well settled. 39 N. Y., 369; Beecher v. Conradt, 11 How. Pr., 181.

The motion should be denied.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Juliand v. . Rathbone
39 N.Y. 369 (New York Court of Appeals, 1868)
Beecher v. Conradt
11 How. Pr. 181 (New York Court of Appeals, 1855)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.Y. St. Rep. 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiedmer-v-new-york-elevated-railroad-ny-1886.