Wiedman v. Murray
This text of 189 A.2d 640 (Wiedman v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A six year old child was struck by an automobile driven by the appellee near the center of the 24 foot road in front of his home between crossings. The appeal challenged the court’s action in granting a judgment n.o.V. We find no error. There was some conflict in the testimony as to whether the child was walking or running when struck and whether he was on a toy wagon or retrieving a ball, but there is no contention that the appellee was speeding or otherwise violating a statutory duty. As the trial court observed, there was *238 no evidence as to when the child could reasonably have been seen by the defendant, and hence no proof of an opportunity on her part to avoid the accident after the child left a position of safety. In short, the case falls in the pattern of Cocco v. Lissau, 202 Md. 196, rather than State, Use of Taylor v. Barlly, 216 Md. 94. See also Flyer v. Del Borrell, 227 Md. 545 and cases there cited.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Bruñe, C. J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
189 A.2d 640, 231 Md. 237, 1963 Md. LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiedman-v-murray-md-1963.